Forward-deployed engineers
A senior in your team while the setup lands, or for the product work around it.
A fixed setup for an engineering team that already uses coding agents, or is about to. Repo context files, agent skills, security boundaries, continuous integration and evaluation gates, and training. We run this setup on our own engineering work.
One repo
We read how you review and release, then price a fixed rollout for that repo. A wider rollout is a separate order.
Files and gates your team keeps. Not a tool you rent from us.
How this repo is built, how a change is reviewed, and what the agent must not do.
Repeated tasks written down so the agent does them the way the team already does.
What the agent may read, which tools it may call, and what stays out of the prompt.
Generated code meets the same checks as any other change. Where the change is an AI behavior, the evaluation set has to pass.
The people who review the code, on the setup they will own. We leave when the team can change it without us.
We start where the team already feels the mess. Usually one repo.
Review, continuous integration, secrets and what is allowed to leave the building. The price covers that repo, and you see it before we start.
The files land in the repo. They follow your review, like any other change.
Continuous integration and evaluation gates, then training with the people who will live with it. Another repo is a later fixed-price order.
The rollout is the engineering setup we already use, written so another team can run it. The wider company uses agents in sales and recruiting, on our own portal.
Repo context, skills and continuous integration gates are how our own engineers work. We do not ask you to adopt a setup we do not use.
Those teams have agents in the loop as well, with the same idea: permissions, a log, and a person when the step needs one.
The company runs on our own portal. That is the operating picture the coding setup sits inside.
Ad-hoc use of coding agents does not survive contact with review, secrets and onboarding.
The rollout is the team's setup. The other offers are a senior in the team, or one product system to put into production.
Why a team standard matters once the agent can open a pull request.
Short answers on scope and ownership.
The ones your team will actually use. The delivery is files and gates in your repo, so you are not locked to a vendor we picked.
Neither. It is engineering and training. You own the files. We do not leave you with a slide and a tool login.
A fixed price before we start, for one repo. A wider rollout, more repos, or deeper gates are scoped separately, still at a fixed price.
A consultant on the consulting page joins your team and ships product work. This rollout leaves a setup the whole team uses. Teams often want both: someone in the team, and the standard written down.
The boundary is part of the rollout: what the agent may read, what it may call, and what must never enter a prompt. Data stays in your environment.
Ready to talk?
We will say straight if you need a rollout, a person in the team, or both.
